Read below at the excert taken off of the G&F press release. Mr. Morgan was the only one that had a set of balls out of the whole bunch & went by what he knew was "Public Opinion" on the deal. The rest went by some study that of all places, UALR, where they surveyed a whooping 960 hunters, half residents & half OOS out of the 60,000 that bought Arkansas Duck Stamps. That is just 2% of the duck hunting population that was surveyed but yet, that 2% decided for the other 98% what would happen! If I remember right, out of their survey, the majority they suveyed, 60%, wanted the spinners back, thats a whole 576 out of the 960, so in reality, not the massive 2% made the decission but a more conservitive 1% swung the deal! Mr. Morgan knew this & he knew what he was hearing from the other 99% didn't GeeHaw. My hat is off to him & he has my full respect as for the others, well, fill in the _______________!!!!!!!
That stupid letter Mr. I got a High $$$ Duck Club that caters to OOS'er Dunklin read in support of his & the other's position was the very same letter that was read at the meeting where they voted to place the ban in effect, the only differance, at that time they 100% voted that the data presented was flawed but now what was once flawed is now valid and the data they had was, now, the very same item was used 180 degree's in the oppisite way!
So here is what we got, the G&F did what they did bases on what? The wants of 1% of the total duck hunting population,THE MIGHTY 576 & the data that the Fed's have which was once totally in-valid but now all the sudden is totally valid!
Off the G&F website:
That stupid letter Mr. I got a High $$$ Duck Club that caters to OOS'er Dunklin read in support of his & the other's position was the very same letter that was read at the meeting where they voted to place the ban in effect, the only differance, at that time they 100% voted that the data presented was flawed but now what was once flawed is now valid and the data they had was, now, the very same item was used 180 degree's in the oppisite way!
So here is what we got, the G&F did what they did bases on what? The wants of 1% of the total duck hunting population,THE MIGHTY 576 & the data that the Fed's have which was once totally in-valid but now all the sudden is totally valid!
Off the G&F website:
Commissioner Brett Morgan cast the lone vote to continue the spinning-wing decoy ban. “I can’t support something that we know helps kill juvenile ducks,” Morgan said. “This is an issue that we (commissioners) raised – not the public. The majority of e-mails and phone calls that I’ve received support keeping the ban in place.”
Commissioner George Dunklin, chairman of the Commission’s waterfowl committee, said the decision to rescind the ban was difficult.“I know there’s some dissention about removing the ban, but a UALR survey showed the majority of people wanted spinning wing decoys brought back,” Dunklin said. “We asked all of the surrounding states to come aboard with us on this, but to no avail.”
In support of his position to remove the ban, Dunklin read from a letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that stated there was “no demonstrable impacts on either overall harvest rates or population levels.” [/QUOTE]