Joined
·
623 Posts
Ok, i ask a question on the predator hunting forum a while back about the .17 HMR vs. .17 HM2. i have debated the subject for months and thought i had completely ruled out a .22 LR. but i found this Aguila Hyper-Velocity
it is a .22 LR that is hotter than the CCI stinger. It offers nearly the same knock down out of the muzzle as a .17 HMR. it isn't as accurate, but the .22 LR is much more economical and mossberg offers a bolt action .22 that uses the same mags as my mossberg .22 automatic. I want to use the gun for squirrel hunting and possible coyote hunting so here is the question:
Given that the .22 LR offers a less frangible bullet than that of the .17 HMR, which would be more effective if all shots will be taken at 50 yards or less?
I know that the .17 is more explosive on impact, but a .22 would offer more penetration and a larger wound channel (if neither bullets were expandable).
what do ya'll think
luke:thumb:
it is a .22 LR that is hotter than the CCI stinger. It offers nearly the same knock down out of the muzzle as a .17 HMR. it isn't as accurate, but the .22 LR is much more economical and mossberg offers a bolt action .22 that uses the same mags as my mossberg .22 automatic. I want to use the gun for squirrel hunting and possible coyote hunting so here is the question:
Given that the .22 LR offers a less frangible bullet than that of the .17 HMR, which would be more effective if all shots will be taken at 50 yards or less?
I know that the .17 is more explosive on impact, but a .22 would offer more penetration and a larger wound channel (if neither bullets were expandable).
what do ya'll think
luke:thumb: