I sent them my suggestions for what it's worth. Doubt I can make the meeting. I think predation is a big problem with unsuccessful broods myself.
I went to the meeting and the AGFC had their minds made up what they were going to do before the meeting even started. They didn't listen/hear and they never do.I sent them my suggestions for what it's worth. Doubt I can make the meeting. I think predation is a big problem with unsuccessful broods myself.
So the commissioners can hunt opening day in zone 17, then also hunt the rest of the state on opening day a week laterCan somone please show me some kind of biological/hard evidence of why zone 17 opens up before the rest of the state. :head: I know this gets brought up every year, but I haven't heard/seen any reason why this zone should open up earlier than the rest of the state.
+++++++11111111111111111111I sent them my suggestions for what it's worth. Doubt I can make the meeting. I think predation is a big problem with unsuccessful broods myself.
Who is going to put up the money for the bounty? Unless one can find a private benefactor, I'm entirely opposed to the idea of a bounty. This is because if the AG&FC pays the bounty, it ultimately comes out of our collective pocket. Plus, neither the AG&FC nor me are convinced predators are the primary problem.Good idea on the bounty!! Now if we could just get 'em to go for it???:up:
The Bounty doesn't have to necessarily be always a money thing. Possible points system per kill towards outdoor gear or what ever. "Possibly Sponsored by Some Company or Persons" I know, "Who's going to keep up the points or records of kills." Well all I'm trying to say is there are creative ways of making bounty\reward system work that's cost effective & may help a effort. In our case Turkey Numbers, let us not be Blind:glasses:Who is going to put up the money for the bounty? Unless one can find a private benefactor, I'm entirely opposed to the idea of a bounty. This is because if the AG&FC pays the bounty, it ultimately comes out of our collective pocket. Plus, neither the AG&FC nor me are convinced predators are the primary problem.
Sounds like an administrative nightmare to me. If there is a bounty to be paid, utimately $dollars$ will have to change hands somewhere. Face it, no company in its right mind is going to put up the dollars for a bounty unless there is a profit to be made from it. I don't see how a company can profit from paying a bounty on anything. That leaves only the "government" or some not-for-profit organization. For the government to pay the bounty they must tax people like you and me. They have no other source of money. The "government" (i.e., the AG&FC) doesn't believe that predation is the cause for the current low turkey numbers (and neither do I). So, they ain't going to pay the bounty and I wouldn't stand for it if they got the silly notion. That just leaves some private organization. Perhaps you can talk the NWTF into it, but don't hold your breath. Maybe you can start your own Society For the Extermination of Turkey Predators and charge dues to join. Then you can use the dues to pay the bounty.The Bounty doesn't have to necessarily be always a money thing. Possible points system per kill towards outdoor gear or what ever. "Possibly Sponsored by Some Company or Persons" I know, "Who's going to keep up the points or records of kills." Well all I'm trying to say is there are creative ways of making bounty\reward system work that's cost effective & may help a effort. In our case Turkey Numbers, let us not be Blind:glasses:
I agree, That's what I'm trying to say something simple & creative that will help. Not a super regulated system just a program of sort to get the ball rolling in the right direction. As a politician would say," We to need change Washington" not business as usual.Wheather you support a bounty program or not isn't realy the issue, the ultimate goal is to reduce the number of animals that are destroying the birds and thier habitat. I agree, predation isn't soley responsible for the decline in numbers. However, since the hog population has exploded in this state the turkey numbers have declined. I've seen it on public land up north and definetly on deer leases down south. While the A.G.F.C is addressing the issues of man-made pressures on the birds. They are not doing all they can. It is as simple as allowing hunters like myself and the guys I hunt with an oppertunity to assist the commision in controling the numbers of predators/ferrel animals #1 in order to hunt these animals we must take up valuable time during a regular hunting season to do so. #2 we are restricted by the means in which to do so(i.e. gun,muzzeload) #3 in the matter of a bounty. That could be solved by simply allowing hunters to purchase a year round permit for the priveledge I know many hunters would be willing to do just that. And yes, they could look into getting the N.W.T.F and other organisations involved. Whether they implement all or part of these suggestions would at least be a start. I still believe the best conservationists are sportsmen. We just need a little oversight and direction to keep a few bad apples from spoiling the whole bunch. Again I would like to say I agree with most if not all of the comments posted here. :up: