Joined
·
341 Posts
My dad's got 50 acres in oklahoma, about half an hour from Siloam Springs (where I live). My wife's about to get a bit of money and she says I can buy some land. Here's my dilemma: do I try to buy 10 acres that joins dad's property and do my best to turn the whole 50 acres into deer habitat, or do I try to find some land that butts up against the Ozark or Ouachita National Forests? I like the idea of the national forests because I like the idea of very remote wilderness. However, dad's land is probably closer and I know for sure that I can use at least 20 acres of his land for deer hunting. He used to have cattle, so on that 20 acres is about 12 acres of trees and the rest is fescue. We've always seen lots of deer there. But no bears. If I bought land down south, I could try and bait bears out of the national forest and get to hunt bears, which I really want to do. So, I think I'm stuck with 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. What would you do? Dad's land has a massive pond stocked with fish and I might be able to convince him to let me plant switch grass to provide more cover and get the deer to move further away from the woods, and further away from other people's land. As it is, they don't get anywhere near the interior of the 50 acres because it's too open. I can post satellite photos of dad's land if anybody wants to see it.
Jared
Jared